The Life of Chuck

There are very few films that seem to come from a place beyond genres, beyond formulas, even beyond storytelling itself, films that seem to tap into something elemental and inexpressible about the human condition. The Life of Chuck, directed and written by Mike Flanagan, is one of those rare cinematic miracles, a true cinematic gem. Adapted from a short story from Stephen King's collection If It Bleeds, this film is neither a traditional horror film, nor a work of science fiction or drama in the strict sense of the word. Rather, it is a metaphysical elegy and a love letter to the inner life we all carry within us, to the infinite multitude that lurks within each individual. This film begins with the collapse of the world and ends with the thrill of childlike wonder, traveling back in time to remind us that even the smallest life holds galaxies within it. With this bold, vulnerable, genre-defying masterpiece, Mike Flanagan not only confirms his status as a great director, he cements his place among the most essential cinematic voices of today. This is not only his best film, it is a defining work of 21st-century cinema and perhaps the most moving adaptation of Stephen King ever made.

The story unfolds backwards, divided into three acts that reveal the different facets of Chuck Krantz's existence, like a rose in full bloom caught in a rewind. In the third act, the film opens onto a world sliding toward a silent Armageddon. California has disappeared, swallowed by the Pacific; birds vanish in midflight; the internet is down, and even the cheap comfort of streaming adult content has evaporated into the digital void. But what disturbs high school teacher Marty Anderson, played with realistic weariness by Chiwetel Ejiofor, is even stranger: a growing number of billboards and advertisements thanking an anonymous figure named Charles Krantz for 39 wonderful years. As cities burn and society collapses, Chuck's smiling face appears on television screens that no longer broadcast news, on posters stapled to half-destroyed lampposts, and even projected in an eerie green glow onto buildings. And yet no one knows who he is. This absurd but strangely poignant mystery forms the emotional core of the film's first chapter, a meditation on the end of the world that dares to ask whether, sometimes, the end of a person's life is the end of the world itself. Mike Flanagan depicts the apocalypse not as an explosive event, but as a slow erosion, a silent disintegration that reflects grief and mortality with painful precision. It's the kind of existential angst that simmers slowly and feels deeply personal, yet is shared by all, echoing anxieties about the pandemic, climate collapse, and emotional numbness.

What follows in the second act is completely unexpected. We meet Chuck, played by Tom Hiddleston in what is perhaps the best performance of his career, not because it is grandiose or spectacular, but because it is modest, sincere, and naked in its emotional clarity. Chuck is an accountant attending a business conference when he is suddenly swept away by the beat of a street drummer (Taylor Gordon) and launches into a spontaneous dance. The moment is joyful, absurd, and deeply moving. It is a celebration of presence, spontaneity, and rebellious vitality. Chuck draws a stranger into his wake, Janice, a heartbroken woman played by Annalise Basso, and together they lose themselves in the movement. The dance, choreographed with touching humanity by Mandy Moore, becomes the emotional center of the film. In a less successful film, this could have come across as mawkish or manipulative. Here, it's transcendent. It evokes those fleeting moments when we are most ourselves, vulnerable, joyful, fully alive. This sequence alone is worth the price of admission. It's a cinematic alchemy that blends music, performance, and emotional subtext in a way that words can't fully convey. And in the context of Chuck's impending death—he doesn't know he only has a few months left to live—it hits like a punch in the gut. We're reminded that joy isn't the absence of suffering, but a rebellion against it.

Then comes Act I. Childhood. Memories. Origins. Chuck, now played by the astonishing Benjamin Pajak, is a boy reeling from the sudden death of his parents and unborn sister. He is sent to live with his eccentric grandparents, played with luminous tenderness by Mia Sara and haunted gravity by Mark Hamill. It is here, in the soft light of a kitchen filled with music and in the menacing shadow of a locked dome, that Chuck's universe begins to take shape. His grandmother teaches him to dance, swaying to the beat of Wang Chung, her laughter ringing out like a beacon in the darkness, while his grandfather, a jaded accountant with a poetic soul, teaches him the language of numbers. Together, they lay the foundations for the man he will become. And through the mysterious, haunted room upstairs, Chuck begins to understand that life is both infinite and fragile, that joy and sadness are eternally linked. Mike Flanagan captures these scenes with the intimacy of memory, and the cinematic language becomes dreamlike, almost tactile. We get the surreal impression that these moments are not simply being shown to us, but are being remembered with such emotional clarity that they take on a mythical resonance. This chapter seems to be a return to the kind of stories Stephen King has always excelled at: the bittersweet wonder of coming of age, where every laugh is tinged with loss.

What makes The Life of Chuck so extraordinary is not just its structure, performances, or technical mastery, but the way it insists, with quiet, unshakeable conviction, that every life matters. That a man like Chuck, a mild-mannered accountant with no particular legacy or dramatic backstory, can be at the center of a cosmic narrative. That the worlds within us are no less vast than the galaxies above us. Nick Offerman's narration runs through the story like a ribbon of breath, both philosophical and down-to-earth, weaving Walt Whitman's poetry into the fabric of the film without ever veering into sentimentality. “I am large,” wrote Whitman. “I contain multitudes.” This film takes that phrase as sacred writing, and by the end, you feel those words beating in your chest like a second heart. Mike Flanagan builds a cinematic universe that isn't made of superheroes or special effects, but of moments — small, human, resonant. A conversation in a car. A shared meal. A child looking at the stars and realizing, for the first time, that he is a universe unto himself.

Chiwetel Ejiofor and Karen Gillan are simply sublime, anchoring the first act of the film with emotional precision. Tom Hiddleston, in a role that demands both enigmatic and ordinary, disappears into Chuck with such grace that it's easy to forget we're watching one of the most recognizable stars in the Marvel universe. Annalise Basso brings radiant depth to what could have been a mere supporting role. Benjamin Pajak, Jacob Tremblay, and Cody Flanagan, who each play Chuck at different stages of his life, convey a unified soul across time. And Mia Sara's return to the screen is simply revelatory, every gesture a balm against the darkness. Even the brief appearances of Matthew Lillard, David Dastmalchian, and Mark Hamill are unforgettable. This cast doesn't just support the film, it embodies its central thesis: that everyone, no matter how briefly seen, contains a world.

The Life of Chuck is not an easy film. It is slow, contemplative, uncompromising, and sincere. It resists cynicism at every turn and asks the audience to trust it, to believe that the tears will come, that meaning will emerge, that the heart will catch up with the mind. For those who let themselves be carried away by its rhythm, it offers a kind of catharsis that transcends genres. This is not a film about death. It is a film about what makes life worth living. It is undoubtedly a masterpiece that deserves 5/5, one of the best Stephen King adaptations ever made, on a par with The Shawshank Redemption, Stand By Me and The Green Mile. But more than that, it's definitive proof that Mike Flanagan is one of the greatest directors working today. His understanding of human frailty, existential desire, and storytelling as emotional architecture is unparalleled.

To say that The Life of Chuck is unforgettable would be an understatement. It doesn't just stay in your mind, it imprints itself on your soul. It asks us to see the world not as it is, but as it is felt by someone else. It's a film about all the Chucks who lived, loved, danced, and disappeared, unnoticed, in the crowd. It is a reminder, in the sweetest and most beautiful way possible, that even when the stars go out, there is light in the spaces we have occupied. There are memories. There is meaning.

The Life of Chuck
Written and directed by Mike Flanagan
Based on The Life of Chuck by Stephen King
Produced by Mike Flanagan, Trevor Macy
Starring Tom Hiddleston, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Karen Gillan, Mia Sara, Carl Lumbly, Benjamin Pajak, Jacob Tremblay, Mark Hamill
Cinematography: Eben Bolter
Edited by Mike Flanagan
Music by The Newton Brothers
Production companies: Intrepid Pictures, Red Room Pictures, FilmNation Entertainment, QWGmire
Distributed by Neon (United States), Nour Films (France)
Release dates: September 6, 2024 (TIFF), June 6, 2025 (United States), June 11, 2025 (France)
Running time: 111 minutes

Seen on June 12, 2025 at Gaumont Disney Village, Theater 7, seat A19

Mulder's Mark: